Amidst the crypto bear market that we’re currently experiencing, numerous crypto companies have started to pause withdrawals from their platform.
This has become rather common for centralised lending platforms, where you deposit your crypto and they will provide you with interest.
Here’s a deep dive into what actually happens:
Why are withdrawals being paused?
Centralised lending platforms operate by attracting you to deposit your funds with them, usually by offering attractive interest rates.
With these funds, they will aim to generate yield through various methods, including:
- Lending out to institutions
- Depositing into DeFi protocols
- Using your crypto for staking and mining
In theory, the amount of interest that you receive will be less than the yield that these platforms generate, so that the platform will earn a profit.
However, we as investors are usually attracted by high yields and can be rather disloyal to any platform.
There is a chance that we will flock to the platform that offers the highest yields.
The fine balancing act
To generate a higher yield, these platforms may be tempted to lend out a higher proportion of the funds deposited that were deposited by their users.
This is because any funds that remain on the platform will not be generating any yield!
Another issue that such platforms need to address is the ability to process customers’ withdrawals. They will need to have enough funds on their platform to ensure that whoever who wishes to withdraw their funds will be able to do so.
As such, there needs to be a balance between:
- The number of funds loaned out to generate yield
- The number of funds in the platform to process withdrawals
If there are more withdrawals than the number of funds the platform currently has, they may need to redeem the funds that they have used to generate the yield.
This may result in them incurring some penalties, resulting in profits lost!
On the other hand, these platforms need to have a high enough yield to entice us to keep their funds with them!
There is this thin balancing act, and most platforms may have left only a small proportion of funds in their platform.
Insolvency is a considerable risk
A bull market usually spells good news for crypto, and users may still leave their funds with these centralised lending platforms.
However, we are now in the midst of a bear market. Coupled with the rise in interest rates by the US Federal Reserve, investors may flock to assets that are deemed safer than crypto.
BREAKING: The Fed raises its main interest rate by 75 basis points, the largest increase since 1994 https://t.co/vzQaZzNoz8 pic.twitter.com/LQnUOnUBsw
— Bloomberg (@business) June 15, 2022
Furthermore, the recent Terra crash has led to many firms losing a significant portion of their funds.
With so much fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) in the crypto market, many investors may have started withdrawing their funds.
As a result, these centralised platforms may not have enough funds on hand to process these withdrawals, eventually causing them to pause withdrawals as they aim to recover enough funds.
Otherwise, they may become insolvent, where they are unable to pay back all of their debts.
Platforms that are facing issues
Let’s look at 5 platforms to discover what actually went wrong:
#1 Celsius
Celsius was the very first centralised platform that paused withdrawals, amidst rumours of the depegging between ETH and staked ETH (stETH).
.@CelsiusNetwork is pausing all withdrawals, Swap, and transfers between accounts. Acting in the interest of our community is our top priority. Our operations continue and we will continue to share information with the community. More here: https://t.co/CvjORUICs2
— Celsius (@CelsiusNetwork) June 13, 2022
To generate a high yield for users who deposited ETH on Celsius, they had staked a huge proportion of the Ethereum funds with Lido Finance, and received staked ETH in return.
In early June, this was estimated to have been $475 million worth of ETH that was staked by Celsius.
However, stETH is just a representation of the ETH that has been staked on the Beacon Chain of the Ethereum network.
It is only possible to withdraw stETH back to ETH once The Merge happens, where Ethereum transitions from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake.
You can find out more about The Merge in our article here, where we additionally explain how Lido Finance may jeopardise the decentralisation of Ethereum.
The Merge was delayed
The Merge was set to be released in Q3 or Q4 of 2022, and has been experiencing numerous delays.
Ethereum developers proposed to delay the difficulty bomb to mid-September, which further suggested that The Merge was having some issues.
Ethereum Grey Glacier Hardfork Activated at Block 15 050 000
The difficulty bomb has been postponed to mid-September.
ETH block time has dropped back from 16 sec. to 13 sec.
More blocks in the network -> More rewards for the miners🕺
— 2Miners (@pool2miners) June 30, 2022
All this meant that Celsius would not be able to give users back their Ethereum, since a significant amount is locked up in the Beacon Chain!
As users became impatient, many started to withdraw ETH from the platform.
This was one of the main reasons why Celsius had to pull the plug and halt all withdrawals.
It has been 3 weeks since Celsius paused withdrawals, and we will be looking out whether they will recover a reported $11.8 billion worth of assets on their platform.
However, there are reports that Celsius is slowly repaying the debts that they owe, and we can only pray that they will be able to do so.
Something is happening behind the scenes at Celsius. They are aggressively repaying the loan and reducing the liquidation price… pic.twitter.com/kEwEi15vVs
— Ran Neuner (@cryptomanran) July 4, 2022
#2 Voyager
Voyager was the second company after Celsius to make the decision to pause withdrawals from their platform.
An update to customers: https://t.co/myyrQ6gZi7
— Voyager (@investvoyager) July 1, 2022
Similar to Celsius, Voyager is an app where you can deposit your funds and earn interest.
One of the ways that they generated yield was by lending their funds to Three Arrows Capital (3AC), a crypto hedge fund in Singapore.
However, 3AC was recently ordered to liquidate its funds, as they were unable to pay back their loans.
BREAKING: BVI court orders liquidation of Three Arrows Capital: Sky Newshttps://t.co/lN4YTbMSLH
— The Block (@TheBlock__) June 29, 2022
Voyager loaned out a significant portion of their funds to 3AC, which was reported to be $665 million.
The financials in Voyager's press release reveal just how bad their situation is. They have a massive hole in their balance sheet labelled "3AC". Nearly three-quarters of their assets have gone missing. https://t.co/WzwnTCwqOE pic.twitter.com/a0YDK1tBaB
— Finance Cassandra (@Frances_Coppola) July 1, 2022
This is roughly 28% of Voyager’s entire assets that users had deposited onto their platform!
We currently have approximately $1.3 billion of crypto assets on our platform, plus claims against Three Arrows Capital of more than $650 million. We also have over $350 million of cash at Metropolitan Commercial Bank. (2/3)
— Voyager (@investvoyager) July 3, 2022
Voyager has filed for bankruptcy, and it remains to be seen what will happen to the funds of the users who deposited into the platform.
BREAKING: #Crypto lender Voyager has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
— Watcher.Guru (@WatcherGuru) July 6, 2022
#3 Vauld
Crypto platform Vauld announced on Monday (4th July) that they too will be suspending withdrawals.
In the meantime, we have made the difficult decision to suspend all withdrawals, trading and deposits on the Vauld platform with immediate effect.
— Vauld (@VauldOfficial) July 4, 2022
Vauld cited challenging market conditions which made them decide to pause withdrawals,
We are facing challenges despite our best efforts. This is due to a combination of circumstances such as the volatile market conditions, the financial difficulties of our key business partners inevitably affecting us, and the current market climate.
— Vauld (@VauldOfficial) July 4, 2022
even after they posted on the 16th of June that they will operate as per normal.
Vauld continues to operate as usual
"We have always maintained a balanced and conservative approach to liquidity management. Bull and bear runs are inevitable, and we deploy fundamentally strong strategies that account for these cycles."
Read more here: https://t.co/6yWVozTydE
— Vauld (@VauldOfficial) June 16, 2022
The main reason cited was due to a huge outflow of capital from the platform, amounting to about $198 million,
This has resulted in significant customer withdrawals in excess of $197.7 million since June 12, 2022 when the decline of the cryptocurrency market was triggered by the collapse of Terraform Lab’s UST stablecoin, Celsius Network pausing withdrawals, and 3AC defaulting on loans.
— Vauld (@VauldOfficial) July 4, 2022
and Vauld will be looking to restructure their company.
Restructuring means that the company will be modifying their debt or operations in attempts to improve the business.
Nexo, who previously offered to acquire Celsius,
After what appears to be the insolvency of @CelsiusNetwork and mindful of the repercussions for their retail investors & the crypto community, Nexo has extended a formal offer to acquire qualifying assets of @CelsiusNetwork after their withdrawal freeze. https://t.co/JFtKTHRLcY
— Nexo (@Nexo) June 13, 2022
provided an offer to acquire 100% of Vauld, which is on the brink of being accepted.
In a consolidation effort aimed at the betterment of the space, as well as the strengthening of our presence in Southeast Asia, we’ve entered exclusive talks with @VauldOfficial for the full acquisition of the Singapore-based company.https://t.co/AtsYQkEc8y
— Nexo (@Nexo) July 5, 2022
#4 Finblox
Finblox is another platform that had some exposure to 3AC. While it did not entirely halt withdrawals, it still lowered the withdrawal limits from its platform.
IMPORTANT UPDATE FROM FINBLOX! pic.twitter.com/VjclRMMiSe
— Finblox (@finblox) June 16, 2022
After further assessment, they started to increase withdrawal limits and re-enable rewards generation.
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT FROM FINBLOX ❤️ pic.twitter.com/Ks98RSTKpp
— Finblox (@finblox) June 30, 2022
Finblox is one of the newer lending platforms on the list, so they may not have been that severely affected.
#5 CoinFLEX
Instead of lending out to a firm, CoinFLEX provided Roger Ver (you may know him as ‘Bitcoin Jesus’) with a $47 million USDC loan, and he failed to meet a margin call.
This was confirmed by CoinFLEX’s CEO, Mark Lamb.
Roger Ver owes CoinFLEX $47 Million USDC. We have a written contract with him obligating him to personally guarantee any negative equity on his CoinFLEX account and top up margin regularly. He has been in default of this agreement and we have served a notice of default.
— Mark Lamb 💪 (@MarkDavidLamb) June 28, 2022
Roger has denied this claim, and CoinFLEX proceeded to halt withdrawals.
We have temporarily paused withdrawals on @CoinFLEXdotcom as a protective measure. We are working to resume withdrawals as soon as possible. Please find our announcement here with more details. Thank you for your support.https://t.co/4jqjLx1PVA
— CoinFLEX (@CoinFLEXdotcom) June 24, 2022
Interestingly, they have used a different approach to solving the issue:
We have temporarily paused withdrawals on @CoinFLEXdotcom as a protective measure. We are working to resume withdrawals as soon as possible. Please find our announcement here with more details. Thank you for your support.https://t.co/4jqjLx1PVA
— CoinFLEX (@CoinFLEXdotcom) June 24, 2022
To fix this $47 million debt, CoinFLEX has launched a new token, called Recovery Value USD (rvUSD), to pay off this debt.
Another centralized crypto lending firm could be in dire straits. CoinFLEX halted withdrawals a few days ago and has now revealed that it will sell rvUSD tokens to recover $47 million in funds lost from a single whale’s bad debt. https://t.co/5gtObtMR2O
— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) June 28, 2022
They are offering a 20% interest rate on the token, in hopes of attracting investors to write off their debt.
This is a different strategy compared to other platforms, and it will be interesting to see if CoinFLEX is able to resume withdrawals soon.
What about other lending platforms?
Some platforms may have gotten ‘lucky’ and they did not see the need to suspend withdrawals. Here’s what happened to them:
#1 BlockFi
While BlockFi has not paused any withdrawals yet,
We continue to process all withdrawals within our standard terms of service.
Our Client Service team is here to support you with any questions you may have: https://t.co/YhgkB4tIXq
— BlockFi (@BlockFi) June 22, 2022
They managed to liquidate an over-collateralised loan with a “large client”.
BlockFi can confirm that we exercised our best business judgment recently with a large client that failed to meet its obligations on an overcollateralized margin loan. We fully accelerated the loan and fully liquidated or hedged all the associated collateral.
— Zac Prince (@BlockFiZac) June 16, 2022
While things seem to be going more smoothly for BlockFi, they have signed a $250 million revolving credit facility with FTX, so that they will have enough funds to navigate tough times like we are currently facing.
1) Today we’re injecting $250m into BlockFi and partnering with them so they can navigate the market from a position of strength.https://t.co/nocsdi0GLF
— SBF (@SBF_FTX) June 21, 2022
Despite the bear market, BlockFi has increased interest rates for certain cryptocurrencies on their platform.
On Friday, July 1, 2022, we’re increasing our rates for BTC, ETH, USDC, GUSD, PAX, BUSD, and USDT** in the BlockFi Interest Account (BIA).*
BTC rates: pic.twitter.com/rjM2KlLkl9
— BlockFi (@BlockFi) June 24, 2022
BlockFi seems to have a better risk management system compared to other platforms, so in theory, they should still be able to thrive.
2) BlockFi has careful risk management and great leadership.
So they successfully removed at-risk counterparties preemptively.
BlockFi customer assets are appropriately managed, with no debt/risk from 3AC, Celsius, etc.
— SBF (@SBF_FTX) June 21, 2022
#2 Hodlnaut
The Singaporean crypto lending platform did not halt withdrawals.
Moreover, due to their requirements for collateralised loans, they were not exposed to 3AC.
Due to the non-disclosure agreements they have with their counterparties, they are unable to disclose who their borrowers are.
Nevertheless, the incidents with other lending platforms have also encouraged Hodlnaut to become more transparent in the near future.
#3 Nexo
Amongst all of the lending platforms, it seems that Nexo has ridden the tide well, and is even poised to gain control of different lending platforms.
Similar to Hodlnaut, Nexo did not have any exposure to 3AC.
.@Nexo has $0 exposure to Three Arrows Capital.
Nexo has always differentiated itself from others as being a very conservative lender with stringent risk management and strict over-collateralization requirements, regardless of borrowers' reputation. https://t.co/VP37WdEn7j— Nexo (@Nexo) June 15, 2022
With the acquisition offers to both Celsius and Vauld, Nexo has hired Citigroup to advise on how they can acquire these firms.
In case you’ve missed it, catch up on the biggest Nexo story of the week.https://t.co/Y5VwgSfMwx
— Nexo (@Nexo) June 25, 2022
Moreover, Nexo has emphasised that they operate based on core fundamentals, including over-collateralisation,
#NexoFundamentals: Overcollateralization ⚓
A principle we’ve adhered to since day one. No entity, be it a person or an institution, will receive credit from us without sufficient backing that fulfills our strictest collateralization requirements.https://t.co/BSjmb1c7oU
— Nexo (@Nexo) June 20, 2022
and prudent risk management.
#NexoFundamentals: Risk Management ⚖️
Our prudent risk exposure and wide range of successful products synergize into a strong liquidity position. This allows us to service our clients’ needs, regardless of market conditions, while maintaining growth.https://t.co/SpAOTMd8RL
— Nexo (@Nexo) June 19, 2022
Nexo seems to be doing well despite the market turmoil, and they even have a live audit to show if their customers’ assets are fully backed or not!
Conclusion
The landscape for centralised crypto platforms will never be the same, with the bear market separating the prudent companies from those who mismanage their funds.
Lending crypto can be risky, and we need more transparency in ensuring that we know who these platforms are lending our funds to!
🔍 Navigate the DeFi Space NOW with Krystal!
Start your journey NOW on Desktop, iOS or Android
📱 Social Media
- Follow us on Telegram:
Announcements | Krystal Global | Krystal Vietnam 🇻🇳| Krystal Russia 🇷🇺 | Krystal Korea 🇰🇷 | Krystal Turkey 🇹🇷 | Krystal Africa 🌍 | Krystal Indonesia 🇮🇩 | Krystal India 🇮🇳 | Krystal Bangladesh 🇧🇩 - YouTube